Advancing patient monitoring, diagnostics, and treatment strategies for transplant precision medicine

Organization: Elsevier Ltd
Journey Stage: (K) Early Survival After Transplant
Organization Type: Society or Professional Organization
Use Case(s): Allocation, Clinical Intervention, Diagnostics, Patient Experience
Country: France

Pulled from PubMed

Alexandre Loupy 1, Marta Sablik 2, Kiran Khush 3, Peter P Reese 4

Transplant medicine faces substantial challenges, as patients require lifelong immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection. Immunosuppressive regimens to date, while reasonably effective at preventing acute rejection, cause numerous health complications, compromising quality of life and patient survival. A shift towards personalised immunosuppression is needed to improve allograft health, reduce long-term adverse effects, and optimise post-transplant outcomes. This necessity has driven advancements in post-transplant monitoring and diagnostics. Innovative monitoring biomarkers and novel diagnostic modalities have been developed to advance transplant care, with many showing promise for widespread clinical implementation. With advances in artificial intelligence, algorithms have the potential to integrate multidimensional data on the immune system and allograft health, offering a comprehensive view of transplant status. This Series paper highlights the state of post-transplant immunosuppression, monitoring, and diagnostics, emphasising the transformative role of emerging innovations to personalise both allograft and patient care. Their implications could extend to xenotransplantation, further broadening their potential to redefine transplant medicine.

Key Contact:

Alexandre
Loupy
M.D; PhD, Professor of Medicine at APHP, Head of INSERM Team @U970 PARCC, Director of the Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), Adjunct Pr Cedars Sinai Los Angeles

The Alliance is committed to fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across the donation and transplantation community. Research and materials shared on this page are contributed by individual authors and organizations. While we aim to provide a valuable forum for exchange, submissions are not formally reviewed or endorsed by The Alliance. The perspectives expressed belong solely to the authors, and users are encouraged to review content thoughtfully and in the context of their own professional judgment.