Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation

Organization: Frontiers
Journey Stage: (*) Not Part of Journey Stages
Organization Type: Society or Professional Organization
Use Case(s): Allocation, Clinical Intervention, Diagnostics, Patient Experience
Country: Switzerland

Pulled from PubMed

Andrea Peloso 1 2, Beat Moeckli 1 2, Vaihere Delaune 1, Graziano Oldani 1 2, Axel Andres 1 2, Philippe Compagnon 2

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer algorithms used to complete tasks that usually require human intelligence. Typical examples include complex decision-making and- image or speech analysis. AI application in healthcare is rapidly evolving and it undoubtedly holds an enormous potential for the field of solid organ transplantation. In this review, we provide an overview of AI-based approaches in solid organ transplantation. Particularly, we identified four key areas of transplantation which could be facilitated by AI: organ allocation and donor-recipient pairing, transplant oncology, real-time immunosuppression regimes, and precision transplant pathology. The potential implementations are vast-from improved allocation algorithms, smart donor-recipient matching and dynamic adaptation of immunosuppression to automated analysis of transplant pathology. We are convinced that we are at the beginning of a new digital era in transplantation, and that AI has the potential to improve graft and patient survival. This manuscript provides a glimpse into how AI innovations could shape an exciting future for the transplantation community.

Key Contact:

Andrea
Peloso
Surgeon and Scientist at HUG (Geneva University Hospitals)

The Alliance is committed to fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across the donation and transplantation community. Research and materials shared on this page are contributed by individual authors and organizations. While we aim to provide a valuable forum for exchange, submissions are not formally reviewed or endorsed by The Alliance. The perspectives expressed belong solely to the authors, and users are encouraged to review content thoughtfully and in the context of their own professional judgment.