Complex System Methodology for Meta Architecture Optimization of the Kidney Transplant System of Systems of the Kidney Transplant System of Systems

Organization: ValiantAI, MS&T
Journey Stage: (H) Organ Offered to Patient
Organization Type: Vendor / Corporate Partner
Use Case(s): Allocation

The demand for kidney transplants is growing and far outweighs the supply of kidneys. With approximately 20 percent of kidneys discarded each year, there is an opportunity to develop a methodology to analyze the key performance attributes of the complex kidney transplant system. This paper designs and analyzes a meta-architecture for the organ procurement system with a use case in the kidney transplant system. The complex systems and interfaces create emergent behavior that will affect the key performance attributes of Performance, Discard Rate, Observed over Expected Kidney Transplants, Affordability, and Acceptability. These key performance attributes, interfaces, and rules are developed from multiple interviews and events with the systems’ stakeholders. We used fuzzy membership functions to assess the performance of the systems and then optimized them using genetic algorithms. We chose two use cases with one donor and three donors to demonstrate the flexibility of the methodology to determine the meta-architecture for a given number of systems. The maximum overall value obtained for each system of systems and participating systems are shown on a map. Future work includes developing and integrating a system of systems simulation to determine the effect of policy changes on organ procurement systems.

Key Contact:

Richard
Threlkeld
CEO

The Alliance is committed to fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across the donation and transplantation community. Research and materials shared on this page are contributed by individual authors and organizations. While we aim to provide a valuable forum for exchange, submissions are not formally reviewed or endorsed by The Alliance. The perspectives expressed belong solely to the authors, and users are encouraged to review content thoughtfully and in the context of their own professional judgment.