Pulled from PubMed:
Solaf Al Awadhi 1, Enshuo Hsu 2, Thomas B H Potter 2, Ioannis A Kakadiaris 3, David A Axelrod 4, Faith Parsons 1, Andrea M Meinders 1, Victoria Cassell 1, Catherine Pulicken 1, Zulqarnain Javed 5, Paula K Shireman 6, Stefano Casarin 1 7 8, A L Jonathan Gelfond 9, Amy D Waterman 1
BACKGROUND: Transplant is the optimal treatment for kidney failure; however, disparities in access persist. We developed and validated risk indices to predict early dropout at key stages of the transplant-seeking process not captured in national registries. METHODS: We included patients referred for kidney transplant at Houston Methodist Hospital between June 2016, and November 2023. We collected demographic, clinical, patient- and contextual-level socioeconomic variables from electronic health records and publicly available census data. We used machine learning (ML) models to predict the characteristics of patients at higher risk of dropping out: (1) at referral (before starting evaluation), (2) in the process of evaluation (before waitlisting), and (3) during waitlisting (before receiving a transplant). Model performance was evaluated using AUROC. RESULTS: Of 4133 referred patients, 46% did not attend their first transplant evaluation visit. Of 2414 patients who were medically eligible for transplant and started evaluation, 54% did not become waitlisted. Of 2457 waitlisted patients, 31% became inactive on the waitlist. Higher risk patients were consistently older, obese, and socioeconomically disadvantaged, with stage-specific differences: social factors-such as being single, unemployed, less educated, and living in high-deprivation areas-and African American race dominated at referral (AUROC 0.79); clinical comorbidities and both African American and Hispanic ethnicity were prominent at evaluation (AUROC 0.71); and Hispanic ethnicity, smoking, and digital exclusion were key drivers at waitlisting (AUROC 0.76). CONCLUSION: ML models effectively identified dropout risk at referral, evaluation, and waitlisting, enabling early identification of at-risk patients. Targeted interventions could reduce disparities, improve evaluation completion, and increase transplant access.