Machine-learning algorithms for predicting results in liver transplantation: the problem of donor-recipient matching

Organization: Wolters Kluwer
Journey Stage: (D) Evaluation
Organization Type: Society or Professional Organization
Use Case(s): Allocation, Patient Experience
Country: Spain

Pulled from PubMed

Javier Briceño 1, María Dolores Ayllón, Rubén Ciria

Purpose of review: Classifiers based on artificial intelligence can be useful to solve decision problems related to the inclusion or removal of possible liver transplant candidates, and assisting in the heterogeneous field of donor-recipient (D-R) matching.

Recent findings: Artificial intelligence models can show a great advantage by being able to handle a multitude of variables, be objective and help in cases of similar probabilities. In the field of liver transplantation, the most commonly used classifiers have been artificial neural networks (ANNs) and random forest classifiers. ANNs are excellent tools for finding patterns which are far too complex for a clinician and are capable of generating near-perfect predictions on the data on which they are fit, yielding excellent prediction capabilities reaching 95% for 3 months graft survival. On the other hand, RF can overcome ANNs in some of their limitations, mainly because of the lack of information on the variables they provide. Random forest algorithms may allow for improved confidence with the use of marginal organs and better outcome after transplantation.

Summary: ANNs and random forest can handle a multitude of structured and unstructured parameters, and establish non explicit relationships among risk factors of clinical relevance.

Key Contact:

Javier
Briceno
Director, General & Digestive Surgery Unit and Head of the Liver Transplant Program, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía

The Alliance is committed to fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across the donation and transplantation community. Research and materials shared on this page are contributed by individual authors and organizations. While we aim to provide a valuable forum for exchange, submissions are not formally reviewed or endorsed by The Alliance. The perspectives expressed belong solely to the authors, and users are encouraged to review content thoughtfully and in the context of their own professional judgment.