Pancreas Rejection in the Artificial Intelligence Era: New Tool for Signal Patients at Risk

Organization: MDPI
Journey Stage: (K) Early Survival After Transplant
Organization Type: Society or Professional Organization
Use Case(s): Clinical Intervention, Donor Prediction, Patient Experience
Country: Portugal

Pulled from PubMed

Emanuel Vigia 1 2, Luís Ramalhete 2 3 4, Rita Ribeiro 2, Inês Barros 1, Beatriz Chumbinho 1, Edite Filipe 1, Ana Pena 1, Luís Bicho 1, Ana Nobre 1, Sofia Carrelha 1, Mafalda Sobral 1, Jorge Lamelas 1, João Santos Coelho 1, Aníbal Ferreira 4 5, Hugo Pinto Marques 1 2

Introduction: Pancreas transplantation is currently the only treatment that can re-establish normal endocrine pancreatic function. Despite all efforts, pancreas allograft survival and rejection remain major clinical problems. The purpose of this study was to identify features that could signal patients at risk of pancreas allograft rejection.

Methods: We collected 74 features from 79 patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and used two widely-applicable classification methods, the Naive Bayesian Classifier and Support Vector Machine, to build predictive models. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and classification accuracy to evaluate the predictive performance via leave-one-out cross-validation.

Results: Rejection events were identified in 13 SPK patients (17.8%). In feature selection approach, it was possible to identify 10 features, namely: previous treatment for diabetes mellitus with long-term Insulin (U/I/day), type of dialysis (peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, or pre-emptive), de novo DSA, vPRA_Pre-Transplant (%), donor blood glucose, pancreas donor risk index (pDRI), recipient height, dialysis time (days), warm ischemia (minutes), recipient of intensive care (days). The results showed that the Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine classifiers prediction performed very well, with an AUROC and classification accuracy of 0.97 and 0.87, respectively, in the first model and 0.96 and 0.94 in the second model.

Conclusion: Our results indicated that it is feasible to develop successful classifiers for the prediction of graft rejection. The Naive Bayesian generated nomogram can be used for rejection probability prediction, thus supporting clinical decision making.

Key Contact:

Emanuel
Vigia
Medical Doctor at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central.

The Alliance is committed to fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across the donation and transplantation community. Research and materials shared on this page are contributed by individual authors and organizations. While we aim to provide a valuable forum for exchange, submissions are not formally reviewed or endorsed by The Alliance. The perspectives expressed belong solely to the authors, and users are encouraged to review content thoughtfully and in the context of their own professional judgment.