The Alliance

Spotlight Series

The Alliance Spotlight Series is a recurring one-page publication for front-line healthcare professionals, offering quick-takes on critical topics affecting the field of organ donation and transplantation. We encourage you to download these issues and share them with your front-line colleagues and partners.

Spotlight Series Past Issues

Exclusive Access

Take advantage of our 2023 professional partnership levels of support to receive exclusive early access to The Alliance Insight Series publications.

You’ll still have access to all our materials when they go online one month after publication.

Volume VIII ,
Issue 3
AdobeStock 479743416 Scaled E1644526206751
Many have questioned whether the U.S. should move to an opt-out donation system (aka presumed consent) like many countries have. Is it a simple decision? Would it really increase donation?

Opt-In vs Opt-Out Donation Systems

The United States currently employs an opt-in donation system, but many have questioned whether the U.S. should move to an opt-out donation system like many countries have. This decision, however, is not a simple one as the two systems may not be comparable from both legislative and cultural perspectives.

OptUnder the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), the U.S. opt-in system allows individuals to register their legally binding decision to be a donor, that cannot be overturned by family or agents. The UAGA is based on the principles of Gift Law (e.g. wills and estate gifts) that can only be changed by the donor themselves, unless they are a minor.

If an individual is not a registered donor, the decision to donate falls to the authorized legal party, most often Next of Kin (NOK) or legal agent, who make the decision whether to donate. Thus, the U.S. system provide two opportunities to request and act on the donation decision, first from the individual and second from the NOK/Agent, if no decision was recorded by the individual. In the U.S., a decision not to donate, is generally not recorded in state donor registries, but are routinely a legally binding option in each state’s Durable Power of Attorney for Healthcare (DPAHC). If there is a conflict between a DPAHC and a state donor registry decision, the most recent recorded decision prevails.

Most countries that have adopted an opt-out donation system, such as practiced in Spain, the U.K., Austria, and France, are founded on the legal notion that deceased donor organs are a public good and as such, may be legally recovered for transplant without specific authorization of the individual or family, unless the individual has recorded a decision not to donate upon death. In reality, countries with “opt-out” systems routinely do not operate donor registries nor non-donor registries, however these countries routinely seek family authorization at the time of death. Such systems are considered to be “soft” opt-outs.

One of the newest opt-out countries, the U.K., has sought to keep its donor registry by encouraging individuals to opt-in or to opt-out of donation by registering their decision. However, either decision can be changed if the family or legal proxy has newer information that indicates a change in the individual’s thoughts surrounding their decision to donate. Within the opt-out systems, a donation conversation will be initiated with the family to determine the patient’s wishes, regardless of their registered decision. If the patient has not registered their wishes, the donation conversation is approached with the assumption that he or she is a donor, however, the family can object to donation.

Which system is better? This question does not have a black and white answer.


(Data CreditIRODAT Organ Donation Data, shared by Tom Mone, OneLegacy)

The data demonstrates that the U.S. system is currently leading in donors per million and donors per deaths. Nonetheless, it is apparent that there is not a ‘one-size’ fits all system. Each country must examine which system best aligns with their political-structure, culture, and legislative oversight.

Culturally, the U.S. tends to value individual rights in its laws and social practices more than many countries and to exhibit a more skeptical attitude towards the government, so it seems appropriate to promote a system that focuses on personal autonomy and encourages individuals to legally register their wishes and to have those decisions protected through legislation.

Ultimately, neither system is a “one-size-fits-all” answer to ending deaths on national waitlists. The unfortunate reality is that even with more registered donors, the waitlists could be longer given that fewer than 1% of all deaths enable medically viable organ donors. Therefore, while it is imperative that deceased donation is optimized, patients on the waitlist will also need the help of the millions of others here in the US and around the world who could be considered for living donation.

Helpful Resources

Watch the Conversation Series episode on this topic:


Questions & Comments

Please send all questions and/or feedback to [email protected].

Worth Sharing
Volume VIII, Issue 3

A Special Thanks to This Series’ Contributors

Hedi Aguiar
Hedi Aguiar
Program Consultant
Organ Donation and Transplantation Alliance
Tom Mone
Tom Mone
Chief Executive Officer
One Legacy, CA
Deanna Fenton
About the Editor |
Deanna Fenton

Deanna is a knowledgeable and versatile professional with diverse experiences in healthcare, client relations, marketing, project management and demonstrated skills in leadership and advocacy. Prior to joining The Alliance, she worked in Hospital Development at her local OPO in the state of New Jersey where she served as the clinical liaison to a number of Level 1 Trauma & Neuroscience centers as well as community hospitals. Her personal connection as a donor family and friend fuels her passion to support her colleagues across the donation-transplantation continuum through the development of valuable educational resources that ultimately boost performance and improve outcome measures. Deanna holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and a minor degree in Public Health from Montclair State University. In her spare time, Deanna enjoys visiting vineyards, spending time with her family, and traveling in hopes of visiting all seven wonders of the world.

Advancing All.

The Alliance is not a membership organization and therefore relies on annual voluntary financial support from OPOs and transplant programs who find value in our programs and initiatives.

We invite you to join us as a professional partner